Home What Do The Scriptures Say? What Do Others Say? Modern Applications Common Objections My Purpose & Perspective Contact

TZITZIT FOR WOMEN.COM

Copyright © 2011 Christy Anderson.   All Rights Reserved.

In any case, the following are the most common objections I have come across as to the reasons why women either have not or do not wear tzitziyot. In my research I have found that there is ample evidence to suggest that if a woman desires to fulfill this command, she is not forbidden to do so (although there are; however, some who say women should not wear tzitzit, they seem to be in the very minority).

The ultimate litmus test seems to be the view of her spiritual authority. In this case, for a single woman, it would be Messiah. In the case of a married woman, her husband would have the ultimate say. The problem that ultimately has caused the greatest confusion over the issue seems to be the
practical application of the command, i.e. for the woman who desires to fulfill the command, how should she in practical terms fulfill this mitzvah?

Below is both a list of the common objections given and also some of the issues that raise the question of actual 'application' of this command. Hopefully, this information will provide women with the information surrounding all the relevant issues and ultimately, enable each woman to decide the specific method in which she will use to fulfill the command to attach tzitziyot to her garments.

Objection #1

Over the years it became customary halachah that women would become exempt from any commandment that required certain 'time restrictions,' meaning, if the commandment was required to be prescribed at a set time than a woman, because of her duties to the family, was exempt from obligation to these commands. The command of tzitzit, according to the sages, fell into this 'time restricted' command because it was limited to “daytime only,” since one could not view the tzitzit in the dark.

Things to consider:

1. If women are truly exempt from 'time restricted' commands, then it would stand to reason that the moedim (God's appointed times) would fall more heavily in this category than would tzitzit.  But clearly women are not exempt from things like the Sabbath even though it is “time restricted.”

2. Does applying tzitzit to a woman's garment interfere with or enhance her ability to train up her children in the way in which they should go?

3. Does the Scriptures include women in this command specifically rather than exclude women (see our word for word analysis on our
What the Scriptures Say page)? And if women are specifically included, than would that mean that this tradition stands in direct conflict with a stated command of God?

Objection #2

Deuteronomy 22:5 states that a man should not wear a women's clothing, nor a woman wear man's clothing. This verse has been used by some as a 'proof text,' as to why women became excluded from the command to wear tzitzit, since over time, the prayer shawl became identified more closely as being a man's garment.


Things to consider:

1. If a woman chooses to wear a prayer shawl in fulfillment of this command, does that automatically mean she is wearing a 'man's' garment? Or, could it be that if a woman decides to wear a prayer shawl as a 'method' of fulfilling the command to wear tzitziyot, and ensures that her prayer shawl carries with it in it's natural design a distinctly feminine appearance and quality, would this act provide both a method for fulfilling the command to wear tzitziyot as well as allow her to also not violate the command concerning cross-dressing?

2. If you saw a man wearing a distinctly feminine prayer shawl, (like my personal one shown at the top of each page on this site) would that man actually be the one who is violating the command related to cross-dressing in Deut 22:5?

3. Because men have traditionally been seen in common practice today as wearing a tallit katan, would a woman who uses this 'method' violate the command concerning cross-dressing? Or, if she utilized distinctly feminine undergarments, and distinctly feminine threads, would she thus, fulfill the command of tzitziyot and also not violate the command concerning cross-dressing?

Objection #3

It is often stated in traditional halachah that the
ONLY garments that are “square” or rectangular in shape require tzitziyot to be attached to them.


Things to Consider:

1. At certain times in history people believed the earth itself was flat.  Of course we know today that the world is in fact sphere shaped.  As humans we tend to think two dimensionally, and if we hear the word 'corners' almost everyone pictures a square in their mind; however if we look at how God utilizes the word for corners in Scripture, He specifically uses it in a three dimensional manner in reference to the earth, which is shaped like a sphere. The term is also specifically used in the Hebrew language in such a way that it assumes a generality of directions (north, south, east and west). The actual Torah text itself does not mention anything about a requirement for the garment to be square, but rather, that we simply place tzitziyot on the garments with which we cover ourselves in the four directions. Since the command is to be eternal, and because God knew our clothing styles would change, if we negate applying this command based
only on this tradition, then the tradition comes in conflict with a stated command of God. However, this does not mean that we can not continue to apply the tradition, it simply means we should not neglect to follow the command because of the tradition, nor are we in violation of the command if we forgo the tradition. Thus, it is more important to follow the command itself, than to follow a tradition to the point that we neglect to follow a stated command of God.



Common Objections

A FEW QUICK THOUGHTS TO CONSIDER


Below are several comments I found on the Internet back in 2004 regarding various opinions regarding women wearing tzitziyot.  But first, I offer you these few thoughts for your consideration.

It’s rather interesting to me that the men who often want to restrict women from obeying the command to wear tzitziyot are the same men who are quick to blame women for sin in the world based on the fact that Eve “went where her own heart and eyes led her” in the garden.  If Eve (going where her own “heart and eyes led her”) got us all in this mess to begin with, wouldn’t it stand to reason that women even more-so than men need to observe the commandment regarding tzitziyot?

With this in mind, either tzitziyot are for women as well as men, or these men are saying only they (i.e. men) are ever tempted to “go where their own heart and eyes lead them.” Numbers 15:38-41  Somehow I don’t believe only men are tempted to go their own way, but all of us, both men and women need this God appointed reminder of God’s commandments for our lives.

Finally, consider the fact that today our culture makes it quite impossible for men not to go through their day without being tempted to lust over women’s bodies often based on how the woman is dressed or other visual advertising.  So if a woman is wearing tzitziyot, wouldn’t that also help remind the men to not lust after that woman (assuming she is already married or too young or otherwise unavailable for that man to pursue) . . . I think you get my meaning here.